When I googled the
title for this essay on 9 August 2019, Google replied:
No results found for "google assisted prose".
Well, that’s all going to change now.
In recent prose writing - I give an example below - I often end up indicating how I have used Google to enable parts of the prose and in a self-conscious way. If you like, I have got myself into a triangle with
a search engine.
As an independent scholar and writer who doesn’t use a
university library any more, I am very reliant on Google. But so are lots of
other people, including those who do also use old-fashioned book-based
libraries. At its simplest, Google allows you to get research results in one
minute which would have taken a day in a library to obtain. When a desktop search
takes up thirty minutes because you try out every version of the query you can
formulate, complete with variant spellings and all the rest, then that could
easily be equivalent to a month-long search involving inter-library loans and
so on.
Of course, there are problems. Not everything has been
uploaded and a serious researcher may well have to go off to a paper-based
archive in the hope of finding information they need. But, on the other hand,
persistent googling will turn up things which you would never have found
through paper-based research - there are just too many bits of paper and too
many archives out there. But a remarkably large number have been uploaded.
More importantly, the google search makes certain kinds of
writing very easy - perhaps, too easy.
There are successful memoirists and
novelists who clearly make extensive use of internet searches. Among books I have
recently reviewed on this Blog, Annie Ernaux’s The Years (originally published 2008; review on this Blog 26 February
2019 ) and Olga Tokarczuk’s Flights (originally
2007; review on this Blog 4 August 2018) struck me as examples of google
assisted prose - Ernaux explicitly acknowledges it:
The web was the royal road to remembrance of things past [ a double allusion here, to Freud and to Proust ]. Archives and all the old things that we’d never even imagined being able to find again arrived with no delay. Memory became inexhaustible, but the depth of time, its sensation conveyed through the odour and yellowing of paper, bent-back pages, paragraphs underscored in an unknown hand had disappeared. Here we dwelled in the infinite present (pages 209 - 210)
The most obvious advantage of google assisted prose (GAP) is
that it enables you to pile up examples and
indulge any taste you may have for
obscure facts. This is clear from Ernaux's prose:
Some smoked grass, lived in communes, established themselves as factory workers at Renault, went to Kathmandu, while other spent a week in Tabarka, read Charlie Hebdo, Fluide Glacial, L’Echo des Savanes, Taknonalasanté, Métal Hurlant, La Guele Ouverte, stuck flower decals on their car doors, and in their rooms hung posters of Che and the little girl burned by napalm.They wore Mao suits or ponchos, sat on the floor with cushions, burned incense, went to see the Grand Magic Circus, Last Tango in Paris, and Emmanuelle …. (page 108)
Here, Google is enabling the recall of things which have been largely forgotten, and enables it not least because Google now offers an extraordinary library
of images which makes any personal album of hard copy photographs look decidedly
meagre.....
A revised and longer version of this Blog post now appears in my book Between Remembering and Forgetting (degree zero, 15 February 2020)
A revised and longer version of this Blog post now appears in my book Between Remembering and Forgetting (degree zero, 15 February 2020)
